I.S.P. |
information systems planning corp. | 5361 Malaspina Place North Vancouver B.C.V7R 4L9 | Easy to remember ISPangle.com or iSPANGLE.com. |
| Performance enhancement | Project manager training | Microsoft Project training | Project information systems | Project Server deployment | About ISP services |
| Team collaboration and Brainstorming | Process Improvement | Understand markets | Design innovative products | Toyota's Lean approach | Workstation ergonomics |
| Time | Topic | Method | Time | |
| 6:30 pm | Communication | Presentation | 20 min | Brian Mullen |
| Brainstorming | Presentation | 20 min | Brian Mullen | |
| 7 pm | Practical demonstration | Team Brainstorming | 5 min | |
| 7:00 | Silent brainstorm ideas on | Write 6 ideas on post it notes | 10 min | Team |
| 7:10 | Collect Ideas | Post ideas on flipcharts | 15 min | Team |
| 7:25 | Select most important ideas | Each person selects the most important idea to them. | 5 min | Team |
| 7:30 | Sort main ideas | Facilitator gets team to sort main ideas from most important to least important. | 20 min | |
| 7:50 | Group sub ideas | Team groups remaining sub ideas under each main ideas in columns. | 5 min | |
| 8 pm | Finish |
Projects play a key role in success of organizations in bringing new products and services to market. Projects help organizations meet the challenges of change.
General Motors needs better design products to compete with the Japanese but cannot deliver. Both GM and Ford have withdrawn from the mini-van market. The Japanese design better products in less time with smaller teams.
| American auto design | Japanese auto design | Improvement | |
|---|---|---|---|
| New car engineering hours | 3 million | 1.7 million | 1.76 times |
| Project timeframe | 60 months | 46 months | 1.3 times |
| Average team size | 903 | 485 | 1.86 times |
| Team organization | Linear sequential process | Concurrent engineering | |
| Specific projects | GM A10 | Honda Accord | Chrysler |
| Project timeframe | 7 years | 3 years | 18 months |
Teamwork – effective collaboration. Collaboration more powerful than individual thinking. Sharing information essential for decision making.
Communication plays a key role in building teams and managing change.

How do your teams interact and share information? Are your teams organized to facilitate communication? What processes do you use to promote communication?
| Evaluation criteria | Collaborative workspaces | Documents and specifications | Brainstorming | Verbal | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Understandability | Very good | ||||
| Preparation time | 2 hours per page | 10 minutes | Instantaneous | ||
| Multiple inputs | Yes | Limited | Yes | ||
| Evolve over time | Yes | ||||
| Persistence | Long but fragmented | Short lived | |||
| Bandwidth | Narrow | ||||
| Ability to drill down | |||||
| Ability to enhance | Limited to author | ||||
| Visibility of ideas | High | Good | |||
| Turnaround | Current | Weeks to months | Seconds | Minutes to hours | Seconds |
| # of messages / hour | |||||
Time to prepare a message reduces response time but increases comprehension.
If you skip planning to save money your project actually costs more and takes longer
| Level of planning | Improvement | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Key Performance Indicators | L O W | H I G H | Percent | |
| Schedule | Average Schedule Performance | 24% over | 20% under | 44% |
| Budget | Average Performance Against Budget | 12% over | 4% under | 16% |
| Capacity | Average Capacity attained at 6 months | 85% | 96% | 11% |
| Utilization reliability | Average Plant up time at 6 months. | 85% | 100% | 15% |
| Total dollar return on high level of planning | 42% |
A report by the Construction Industry Institute in the US comparing projects shows planning saves time, money and improves the quality of the deliverables. The study included 44 projects in the cost range between $4 million and $350 million with a median of $26 million. The quality of planning was ranked on the seven following factors:
70% of product cost determined by the time the design is completed.
Brainstorming is a key step in creative process to generate innovative, breakthrough ideas that give you a competitive edge.
Turbo brainstorming plays a key role in creative product design. Generation of multiple ideas shares knowledge and stimulates thinking. The flexibility of the process allows teams to move in unexpected directions as breakthrough ideas to be generated.
Usually this interaction takes place in meetings. Turbo brainstorming with post-it notes, accelerates many project phases and activities:
Turbo brainstorming with post-it notes, accelerates many project phases and activities:
Planning turbo brainstorming sessions uses post-it notes to identify topics, allocate available time, assign roles to each participants and outline the agenda.
Brainstorming is better than one-on-one interviews for collecting information because information validated.
Turbo brainstorming saves you time in meetings and produces better results. The table
provides a comparison between traditional meetings and assumes you have
ten people plus the facilitator in a meeting each with six ideas.
| Steps in the brainstorming process | Traditional brainstorming | Turbo brainstorming is faster and cheaper | Improvement with turbo brainstorming |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Collect sixty ideas from participants | 60 minutes | 10 minutes | 6 times |
| 2. Select and sort ten major ideas | 60 minutes | 15 minutes | 4 times |
| 3. Group sub ideas under major topics | 60 minutes | 5 minutes | 12 times |
| 4. Label groups | 5 minutes | 5 minutes | same |
| Total time | 3.75 hours | .6 hours | 6.4 times |
| Start | 8:00 am | 8:00 am | |
| Finish | 12:15 pm | 8:45 am | |
| Number of people | 11 people | 11 people | |
| Cost per person per hour | $100 | $100 | |
| Cost to brainstorm Topic at $100/ hour | $4,160 | $640 | 6.5 times |
Turbo brainstorming compresses project duration. Because you can cover more topics in less time you can compress three four-hour meetings into a single three-hour meeting. This saves project schedule time, travel time, giving your project team more time to complete their project tasks.
Each topic can take 20 to 45 minutes so you can brainstorm four to six topics in a three-hour meeting. By covering topics faster you can reduce three four-hour meetings into a single three-hour meeting reducing cycle time from 15 days to 3 hours. This saves project time, team-meeting time and money while at the same time exploring topics in much more depth.
You can accomplish in one meeting with turbo brainstorming what takes three ordinary meetings. |
Three traditional three-hour meetings. | One three-hour meeting with Turbo brainstorming. | Improvement with Turbo brainstorming. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of three-hour meetings | 3 meetings | 1 meeting | 66% reduction |
| Number of topics covered in depth | 4 to 6 | 4 to 6 | Better quality with more depth |
| Number of people (* add one facilitator) | 10 people | 11* people | Same |
| Level of participation | Low | High | Better participation |
| Buy-in to final results | Medium | Higher | Higher participant buyin |
| Elapsed schedule time depends upon time between meetings. For meetings one week apart the total elapsed time for three meetings would be two weeks compared to 3 hours. | 15 days | 3 hours | 92% reduction in cycle time. |
| Cost per person per hour | $100 | $100 | Same |
| Cost per meeting | $3,000 | $3,300 | Same |
| Number of meetings | 3 meetings | 1 meeting | 66% reduction |
| Total Cost for all meetings | $9,000 | $3,300 | 64% reduction |
The biggest benefits of turbo brainstorming are improved quality of results, the reduction in cycle time, reduced cost of meetings and increased energy of team members.
With traditional meetings you have to publish results at the end of each meeting and refresh people's minds at the start of the next meeting. When you compress three meetings into one you can only have to write up the final results and can skip the interim results.
Turbo Brainstorming can reduce your meetings by 75% and produce better results.
Turbo brainstorming energizes a team,
stimulates thinking and leads to creative breakthroughs.
Turbo brainstorming has developed by ISP information systems planning corp.
Patterns capture the essence of a process. Brainstorming patterns help you structure the topics in a brainstorming session depending upon various situations you encounter.
| Process/Pattern name | Steps within the process or pattern |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Idea processing pattern | Ideas process may be plans, objectives, risks, requirements, deliverables, strategies, design features, .
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2. Turbo brainstorming process |
Each session may cover four to forty topics. Advanced agenda planning and preparation increases results of a brainstorming session.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3. Brainstorm next topic |
Each brainstorming topic takes between thirty and sixty minutes.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4. Plan Meeting Agendas |
Meetings may consist of four topics in a half day meeting to 40 topics covered in a five day strategic planning session.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5. Debono's six thinking hats sequence | de Bono six thinking hats help speed creative thinking by a team.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6. Project planning pattern | Tips to facilitate high-performance teams including skills assessment, Recruiting tips. Training and rehearsal.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 7. Objective-setting pattern |
Understanding client objectives key to satisfying clients. Often this involves developing a consensus amongst conflicting objectives of the project stakeholders.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8. Project scoping pattern |
Scoping identifies which objectives, features, requirements, etc are either in scope, deferred to a later release or out of scope. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 9. Deliverables definition pattern |
Deliverables are results or outputs from projects and tasks. Deliverables are elaborated during the requirements and design phases. The definition of deliverables forms the foundation for estimating.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 10. Problem-solving pattern |
Brainstorming speeds problem solving by defining problems and root causes and then generating more creative solutions. Joint problem solving helps build a high-performance teams faster.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 11. Impact analysis brainstorming | Impact analysis reduces conflicts due to competing alternatives.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12. Process mapping pattern | Process mapping can be used to develop costs for current and new resource
workloads to develop cost benefit comparison between previous and new
processes.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 13. SWOT Strategic planning Pattern | SWOT analysis contains four topics to kickstart Strategic Planning.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 14. JAD joint application design sessions |
Joint application design expedites requirements definition by defining requirements and developing user interface design with group of key users.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 15. Cost Benefit analysis |
Cost/benefit analysis creates a powerful tool for communicating benefits to project sponsors. Cost benefit analysis also focuses the project team on making sure the major benefits are achieved. It also helps them make the correct trade-off analysis when making design and deployment decisions. The current and new costs feed into Cost Benefit analysis from the Process Mapping pattern.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 16. New product design pattern |
Clever design key to product success as measured by revenue, profitability and increased market share. Product should deliver increased value at a lower cost when compared to competitive products. Turbo brainstorming stimulates creativity during product design, increases the generation of breakthrough ideas, increases team collaboration, speeds problem solving; all essential to new product design. Turbo brainstorming expedites product projects to deliver new products in a timely fashion.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17.Checkerboard brainstorming
|
Create a personal brainstorming system using a Microsoft Word table where the cells simulate post-it notes.
|
Speeds up many processes in Project management and completing Project Activities.
Teams that develop and refine plans to understand the big picture develop stronger commitment to plans. These sessions also build respect for other team members.
|
Phase n Start | Phase n Middle | Phase n Finish |
Team planning sessions identify tasks using post-it notes which are organized on sets of flipcharts. When the team planning session is completed then capture the results in Microsoft Project.
Click this link to register for any of my Project Management courses
Return to page home
Click here List of Recommended books on Project Management, Team Building, Estimating, Software Development methodologies, requirements definition, and Microsoft Project.
I.S.P. |
information systems planning corp. | 5361 Malaspina Place North Vancouver B.C.V7R 4L9 |
Copyright April 10, 2007 Brian Mullen, I.S.P. information systems planning corp.
Last updated April 18, 2007
About Brian Mullen, M.Sc., president of I.S.P. information systems planning corp.